Inspire, develop, and guide a winning organization.
Create visible workflows to achieve well-architected software.
Understand and use meaningful data to measure success.
Integrate and automate quality, security, and compliance into daily work.
Understand the unique values and behaviors of a successful organization.
LLMs and Generative AI in the enterprise.
An on-demand learning experience from the people who brought you The Phoenix Project, Team Topologies, Accelerate, and more.
Learn how making work visible, value stream management, and flow metrics can affect change in your organization.
Clarify team interactions for fast flow using simple sense-making approaches and tools.
Multiple award-winning CTO, researcher, and bestselling author Gene Kim hosts enterprise technology and business leaders.
In the first part of this two-part episode of The Idealcast, Gene Kim speaks with Dr. Ron Westrum, Emeritus Professor of Sociology at Eastern Michigan University.
In the first episode of Season 2 of The Idealcast, Gene Kim speaks with Admiral John Richardson, who served as Chief of Naval Operations for four years.
Helping leaders succeed and organizations thrive.
New half-day virtual events with live watch parties worldwide!
DevOps best practices, case studies, organizational change, ways of working, and the latest thinking affecting business and technology leadership.
Is slowify a real word?
Could right fit help talent discover more meaning and satisfaction at work and help companies find lost productivity?
The values and philosophies that frame the processes, procedures, and practices of DevOps.
This post presents the four key metrics to measure software delivery performance.
December 11, 2020
Two questions I ask during 1-on-1s might strike people as a bit unusual, but they directly lead to better business outcomes:
Why?
A core reason is that I care about the people I work with, and I want good things for them. I want them to be happy! When I learn there are obstacles to their happiness, we generally have a productive conversation about what can be changed.
My conceit is that more often than not, we’re successful in coming up with approaches that result in them being happier, and I find that very rewarding.
More importantly—for this blog post—I believe that making employees happier results in better business outcomes.
These better business outcomes result from two principles working in concert. The first principle is one that I believe is generally accepted: learning about problems earlier is better than learning about problems later. The value of acting on problems early is literally proverbial (a stitch in time saves nine) so I won’t elaborate further.
The second principle is that employee unhappiness is a very early indicator of problems, earlier than will show up on more traditional project management metrics. Why would this be?
The first time I saw this clearly stated was probably in Kent Beck’s 1999 book Extreme Programming Explained. In the conclusion of the book, Kent offered the insight that “all methodologies are based on fear.” The purpose of the methodology is to prevent those fears from becoming reality.
He then offered a list of his fears. The first item on the list is “doing work that doesn’t matter.” I don’t think Kent is an exception. My experience is that workers want their work to matter, they want their projects to succeed. In short, they care about their work.
This is amazingly helpful! The people doing the work are in the best position to assess how the project is progressing. And I don’t mean just “is the work getting done,” I mean something much richer than that.
They have direct access to the dynamics of the project, such as how good the collaboration is, how engaged they and the rest of the team are, if there are productive discussions of trade-offs, if there is a clear sense of purpose, and many other elements.
When those dynamics aren’t right, the project will underperform. When those dynamics aren’t right, the people on the project can sense it. Because those dynamics threaten the project, threaten the meaning of their work, they are unhappy as a result.
So when I ask “are you happy?” and the answer is anything less than a strong yes, I often learn some very valuable information that helps us get the dynamics of the project back on track.
I’ve used these questions successfully for many years now with good results. Have you asked people these questions? If so, how did it work for you? Please let me know.
Jeffrey Fredrick is the coauthor of Agile Conversations. This blog is a follow-up to his interview on The Idealcast podcast with Gene Kim. You can listen to that interview here.
You can follow Jeffrey on Twitter and Linkedin.
Coauthor of Agile Conversations
No comments found
Your email address will not be published.
First Name Last Name
Δ
As artificial intelligence continues to evolve at a breakneck pace, many organizations are grappling…
In the five years since the publication of Team Topologies: Organizing Business and Technology…
Digital twins have emerged as a game-changing technology for organizations developing and managing complex…
Don’t worry. We get it. Whether you’re from IT or you work with someone…